• Home
    • About Charles and Co Solicitors Birmingham
    • Privacy Policy
    • Complaints Procedure
  • Expertise
    • Commercial / Property
    • Conveyancing
    • Family Law
    • Higher Education Law Solicitors
    • Landlord and Tenant
    • Litigation
  • Our People
    • Jagdip Chahal
    • Gurjit Chahal
    • Ranjit Tiwana
    • Sukhvir Gill
    • Joanne Herbert
    • Rajbant Sangha
    • Aman Rana
  • News
  • FAQ’s
  • Contact
    • Area of Coverage
  • Join Us
  • Home
    • About Charles and Co Solicitors Birmingham
    • Privacy Policy
    • Complaints Procedure
  • Expertise
    • Commercial / Property
    • Conveyancing
    • Family Law
    • Higher Education Law Solicitors
    • Landlord and Tenant
    • Litigation
  • Our People
    • Jagdip Chahal
    • Gurjit Chahal
    • Ranjit Tiwana
    • Sukhvir Gill
    • Joanne Herbert
    • Rajbant Sangha
    • Aman Rana
  • News
  • FAQ’s
  • Contact
    • Area of Coverage
  • Join Us
Toggle panel Social icons
Category:

Oral Exams and Extra Time

Browse:
  • Home
  • Oral Exams and Extra Time

Oral Exams and Extra Time

by admin in Oral Exams and Extra Time
Tags: Extra Exam Time, Medical Student issues, Oral Exams

Recently I was representing a medical student who had been excluded from Medical School for failure to progress.

The student in question had a disability and as per the disability was entitled to extra time during examinations. The extra time had been implemented during written components of the exams, however no adjustments to timings were made for the oral component of the exams (known as the OSCE).

In a number of Medical Schools across the country no allowance for extra time have been made for disabled students in the OSCEs. I have come across varying reasons from logistically it is impossible (I am not sure how the Equality Act 2010 would review that reason), to the standard being tested is such that a medical student needs to be able to review a patient in a set timeframe and that is the standard being examined.

I do not know about you, but I would not mind my Doctor taking their time to take a history of my medical condition and making a fully informed diagnosis of my condition. I know there will be times when snap decisions will need to be made (A&E maybe??), but in those such circumstances it is unlikely that the decision would be made by someone in isolation without input from others.  

Legally the purpose of the Equality Act is to place all students on an equal footing. By virtue of the Act disabled students are often allowed some form of reasonable adjustment during exams to ensure that they are assessed fairly and equally to those without disabilities. If you are not going to allow a disabled student a reasonable adjustment then you need to demonstrate that there is a legitimate aim for not allowing the adjustment (in this case extra time during OSCEs). Usually the legitimate aim to not allow an adjustment would be meeting the standard and/or maintaining academic standard, however the way of achieving this still needs to be proportionate and by that we mean appropriate and necessary. The part Medical Schools often forget to assess is the adverse impact on disabled medical students if they do not allow the extra time for OSCEs. Typically OSCEs are there to examine a medical student’s ability to take a full history, diagnose and then to present their findings.  

I was only recently at a Medical School hearing where I was advised by the Medical School that to overcome the issue of extra time the Medical School were now allowing for 10 minutes per station as oppose to the usual 8 minutes for allstudents. Not sure that is in fitting with placing disabled and non-disabled students on an equal footing… I must say I am a little perplexed with this resolution to the issue.

I have found I am arguing this area with more and more effective results.

Recent Posts

  • Sexual Misconduct

    With the #Me Too movement the goalposts governing the interplay…

  • Covid 19 Impacting Your Studies?

    With this global pandemic comes much uncertainty, but none more…

  • Mental Health and Universities

    The transition from school to University is difficult for most,…

  • Stand Up For Your Rights

    The Higher Education Law Specialist at Charles and Co Solicitors,…

  • Fitness to Practise – A Fair Hearing?

    Anyone who has ever been involved in the Fitness to…

Recent Comments

  • Let sleeping dogs lie v Finality on Divorce? - Charles and co Solicitors | Legal Specialists Birmingham on Gurjit Chahal
  • Plus Business Solutions develop Charles and Co Solicitors Brand New Website - Plus Business Solutions on Litigation
  • Plus Business Solutions develop Charles and Co Solicitors Brand New Website - Plus Business Solutions on Commercial / Property

Categories

  • Academic Appeal
  • Commercial Law
  • Conveyancing Law
  • Covid 19
  • Education Tuition fees
  • Family Law
  • Fitness to Practise
  • Higher Education Law
  • Matrimonial Finance
  • Mental Health at University
  • New Website Launch
  • Office of the Independent Adjudicator
  • Oral Exams and Extra Time
  • PHD
  • Plagiarism
  • Student Union Advice
  • Uncategorized
  • University Complaints
  • University Compliants
  • University Decisions

Our expertise

  • Commercial / Property
  • Conveyancing
  • Family Law
  • Higher Education Law Solicitors
  • Landlord and Tenant
  • Get In Touch

Call Our Experts

16 - 17 Caroline Street, Birmingham, B3 1TR

0121 236 1985

E-Mail: info@charlesandco.org

Charles and Co Solicitors

16 - 17 Caroline Street, Jewellery Quarter, Birmingham, West Midlands B3 1TR

0121 236 1985

E-Mail: info@charlesandco.org

Latest tweets

Could not authenticate you.

Latest News

  • Sexual Misconduct

    With the #Me Too movement the goalposts governing the interplay…

  • Covid 19 Impacting Your Studies?

    With this global pandemic comes much uncertainty, but none more…

  • Mental Health and Universities

    The transition from school to University is difficult for most,…

Copyright reserved 2017

Translate »
×