• Home
    • About Charles and Co Solicitors Birmingham
    • Privacy Policy
    • Complaints Procedure
  • Expertise
    • Commercial / Property
    • Conveyancing
    • Family Law
    • Higher Education Law Solicitors
    • Landlord and Tenant
    • Litigation
  • Our People
    • Jagdip Chahal
    • Gurjit Chahal
    • Ranjit Tiwana
    • Sukhvir Gill
    • Joanne Herbert
    • Rajbant Sangha
    • Aman Rana
  • News
  • FAQ’s
  • Contact
    • Area of Coverage
  • Join Us
  • Home
    • About Charles and Co Solicitors Birmingham
    • Privacy Policy
    • Complaints Procedure
  • Expertise
    • Commercial / Property
    • Conveyancing
    • Family Law
    • Higher Education Law Solicitors
    • Landlord and Tenant
    • Litigation
  • Our People
    • Jagdip Chahal
    • Gurjit Chahal
    • Ranjit Tiwana
    • Sukhvir Gill
    • Joanne Herbert
    • Rajbant Sangha
    • Aman Rana
  • News
  • FAQ’s
  • Contact
    • Area of Coverage
  • Join Us
Toggle panel Social icons
Fitness to Practise
Browse:
  • Home
  • Fitness to Practise
  • Fitness to Practise – A Fair Hearing?

Fitness to Practise – A Fair Hearing?

by admin in Fitness to Practise

Anyone who has ever been involved in the Fitness to Practise (FTP) process will know just how serious and stressful it can be. It is not something to be taken lightly, and whereas in the professional arena there is no doubt that anyone subjected to the process would require and warrant qualified legal representation, it would seem that for students facing the same in the University setting, the automatic right to legal representation is just not there.

Representing students on a daily basis on a number of issues, I have often come across having to justify to Higher Education Institutions why a student should be allowed legal representation, not only at the hearing, but during the investigation stage too. That cannot be right or fair?

FTP is something that hangs over all medical, dental, social work, nursing and midwifery students, to name a few, throughout their studies. I have been involved in cases for all types of students and it never ceases to amaze me the level of inequality some students have had to endure before they even reach me.

The basic principles of a fair trial, underpinned by Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, appear to be of no concern to many a University FTP Panel.

I have a number of FTP cases at present, all at different stages of the process. It goes without saying that being instructed from the outset of the matter, is always best. You get to navigate the case from the start and prevent any missteps on the part of the client. You get to keep a watchful eye on the University and I also find that once the University know they are being watched, their efforts to be fair are that much greater. Of course not all students can afford qualified legal representation, and some are put off getting legal help by either the University or even the Student Union. It is suggested to students that if you get legal help 1) you have something to hide and 2) you will be treated much harsher. Not true.

Not every student instructs early on, a number try and handle the situation themselves, but when you think that a whole team behind the scenes at the University are collaborating and working together to get you out, the odds are really stacked against the lone student.

I have a case at present where the student has been through the whole process alone, including the appeal stage. The University took in excess of six months to investigate the case and then gave the student a mere 10 working days to submit their statement and evidence, sound fair? The University provided no signed witness statements and produced no witnesses at the FTP Hearing itself. This did not seem to perturb the FTP Panel, who despite not hearing a shred of evidence, found the student unfit and withdrew them from the course.

Universities have to accept, whereas it may not be a court of law, FTPs are quasi-legal proceedings, the outcomes of which fundamentally impact the students’ career and future life trajectory. Findings cannot be made without the basic legal principles, as embodied by Article 6, being adhered to.  

adminPost author

Click here to cancel reply.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

XHTML: You can use these tags <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Recent Posts

  • Sexual Misconduct

    With the #Me Too movement the goalposts governing the interplay…

  • Covid 19 Impacting Your Studies?

    With this global pandemic comes much uncertainty, but none more…

  • Mental Health and Universities

    The transition from school to University is difficult for most,…

  • Stand Up For Your Rights

    The Higher Education Law Specialist at Charles and Co Solicitors,…

  • Fitness to Practise – A Fair Hearing?

    Anyone who has ever been involved in the Fitness to…

Recent Comments

  • Let sleeping dogs lie v Finality on Divorce? - Charles and co Solicitors | Legal Specialists Birmingham on Gurjit Chahal
  • Plus Business Solutions develop Charles and Co Solicitors Brand New Website - Plus Business Solutions on Litigation
  • Plus Business Solutions develop Charles and Co Solicitors Brand New Website - Plus Business Solutions on Commercial / Property

Categories

  • Academic Appeal
  • Commercial Law
  • Conveyancing Law
  • Covid 19
  • Education Tuition fees
  • Family Law
  • Fitness to Practise
  • Higher Education Law
  • Matrimonial Finance
  • Mental Health at University
  • New Website Launch
  • Office of the Independent Adjudicator
  • Oral Exams and Extra Time
  • PHD
  • Plagiarism
  • Student Union Advice
  • Uncategorized
  • University Complaints
  • University Compliants
  • University Decisions

Our expertise

  • Commercial / Property
  • Conveyancing
  • Family Law
  • Higher Education Law Solicitors
  • Landlord and Tenant
  • Get In Touch

Call Our Experts

16 - 17 Caroline Street, Birmingham, B3 1TR

0121 236 1985

E-Mail: info@charlesandco.org

Charles and Co Solicitors

16 - 17 Caroline Street, Jewellery Quarter, Birmingham, West Midlands B3 1TR

0121 236 1985

E-Mail: info@charlesandco.org

Latest tweets

Could not authenticate you.

Latest News

  • Sexual Misconduct

    With the #Me Too movement the goalposts governing the interplay…

  • Covid 19 Impacting Your Studies?

    With this global pandemic comes much uncertainty, but none more…

  • Mental Health and Universities

    The transition from school to University is difficult for most,…

Copyright reserved 2017

Translate »
×